|
| |
Recognition of Prior Learning
Policy Purpose
To inform assessors and candidates, of the policy and
principles of MDT’s approach to Recognition of Prior Learning.
RPL Definition
RPL is an acronym for Recognition of Prior Learning. The MDT
adopts the following definition of RPL as referred to in the NSB Regulations No
18787:
“RPL is the comparison of the previous learning and experience
of a Candidate howsoever obtained against the learning outcomes of a specific
qualification, and the acceptance thereof for purposes of certification”
The above definition holds the following implications:
 |
That a comparison of contextualised
competence be done against the schemes requirements. |
 |
That recognition is done for both
learning and experience, (not one or the other only), and |
 |
That the process is focused on the
Candidate and his/her current competence, not historical evidence only |
RPL Approach
The following
principles as the basis to this approach:
 |
RPL practices must be Candidate-centered
and developmental – the Candidate must be credited for what they do know, not
penalised for what they don’t know. |
 |
RPL must have a clear workplace focus. |
 |
RPL will only be recognised for
certification purposes if whole schemes are assessed. Portions of experience
will not be recognised in isolation of the total skill described in the
scheme. |
RPL Purpose
The purpose of RPL as envisaged by the MDT within the
assessment environment is as follows:
 |
To provide access to assessment &
Certification without following the normal route of attending a training
course first. |
RPL Requirements
The MDT has the following:
 |
A clear RPL strategy |
 |
A Quality Management support
infrastructure |
RPL Assessment Plan
The assessment plan includes the following:
 |
Purpose is identified |
 |
Interaction between assessor
and Candidate |
 |
Agreed evidence requirements and types |
 |
Assessment strategy |
Evidence Requirements
 |
Quality of evidence relates to
reliability, validity, authenticity, sufficiency and currency. |
 |
Identification of potential barriers and
alternatives are communicated to the Candidate |
 |
A balance of product, process, knowledge
and historical evidence is maintained |
RPL Process Overview
All RPL practices for certification purposes on MDT programmes
will follow the broad, generic process of RPL as described in the SAQA Policy
Document (Gazette 23186 – 4 March 2002):
RPL Process & Procedure
The following serves as a guideline, the process stages that
are in the RPL process
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Candidate Registration |
1.
Candidate identifies competence areas for RPL purposes |
MDT Registration Form
Service provider |
|
2 |
Pre-assessment Screening |
2.
Service Provider discusses process with Candidate to establish
scope, purpose and viability of assessment
3.
Candidate identifies Scheme for assessment
4.
Candidate performs self assessment against Syllabi |
Pre-assessment discussion
Syllabi
|
|
3 |
Assessment Plan |
5.
Establish evidence requirements
6.
Establish assessment approach, tools & mechanisms
7.
Set dates & times of assessment |
Assessor Guides
Assessment Plan |
|
4 |
Candidate Preparation |
8.
Provide guidance to Candidate in assessment & evidence
principles |
|
|
5 |
Assessment |
9.
Candidate undergoes practical & theoretical assessment
activities |
Assessment Instruments |
|
6 |
Judgment |
10.
Assessor makes judgment on evidence, and / or
11.
Calls for additional evidence, and
12.
Makes a competence & developmental needs judgment
13.
Initial feedback given to Candidate |
Assessment Instruments |
|
7 |
Moderation |
14.
Moderator moderates assessment
15.
Provide feedback to assessor |
Moderation Documents |
|
8 |
Feedback |
16.
Provide feedback to Candidate
17.
Issue of certification |
|
|
9 |
Post Assessment Support |
18.
Identify and channel Candidate into development / training
path if needed |
Declaration of Competence |
Recognition of Qualifications: (Mutual recognition policy)
The MDT and its Service Providers are obligated to recognise
qualifications and statements of attainment where another similar organisation
has validly issued them. However:
It is recognised that due to the wide variance in the context
and environment in which an individuals training and assessment took place, a
particular qualification may not automatically grant equivalent rights or other
guarantees of capability to perform certain skills.
The MDT has the right to consider such issues as currency and
context to perform under specific conditions. Although a qualification that was
issued by another organisation is valid, the person whom the qualification was
issued to will not necessarily be still proficient five years later or in
another context. This is exacerbated when the person has not maintained their
skill through regular practice or refresher training.
When working or performing skills, a single error could have
catastrophic results.
The MDT and its Service Providers therefore assert their
right to assess an individual’s currency regardless of what qualifications are
held before assigning an MDT certification.

The MDT Quality Management System has been
established and is maintained by the Adventure Qualifications Network
cc (AQN). If you would like
further information about their services to the Adventure Industry, please
feel free to contact them at: P.O.Box 2510, Hillcrest, 3650 Tel: 031 767
2160 or by
Email
www.aqn.za.org
|