South African Mountaineering Development & Training Trust

Join The MDT Forum at: http://sa-mdt.ning.com/

 

 

 Recognition of Prior Learning

Policy Purpose         

To inform assessors and candidates, of the policy and principles of MDT’s approach to Recognition of Prior Learning.

RPL Definition         

RPL is an acronym for Recognition of Prior Learning.  The MDT adopts the following definition of RPL as referred to in the NSB Regulations No 18787:

“RPL is the comparison of the previous learning and experience of a Candidate howsoever obtained against the learning outcomes of a specific qualification, and the acceptance thereof for purposes of certification” 

The above definition holds the following implications:

bullet

That a comparison of contextualised competence be done against the schemes requirements.

bullet

That recognition is done for both learning and experience, (not one or the other only), and

bullet

That the process is focused on the Candidate and his/her current competence, not historical evidence only

 RPL Approach      

The following principles as the basis to this approach:

bullet

RPL practices must be Candidate-centered and developmental – the Candidate must be credited for what they do know, not penalised for what they don’t know. 

bullet

RPL must have a clear workplace focus.

bullet

RPL will only be recognised for certification purposes if whole schemes are assessed. Portions of experience will not be recognised in isolation of the total skill described in the scheme.

 RPL Purpose

The purpose of RPL as envisaged by the MDT within the assessment environment is as follows:

bullet

To provide access to assessment & Certification without following the normal route of attending a training course first.

 RPL Requirements  

 The MDT has the following:

bullet

A clear RPL strategy

bullet

A Quality Management support infrastructure

 RPL Assessment Plan         

 The assessment plan includes the following:

bullet

 Purpose is identified

bullet

 Interaction between assessor and Candidate

bullet

Agreed evidence requirements and types

bullet

Assessment strategy

Evidence Requirements

bullet

Quality of evidence relates to reliability, validity, authenticity, sufficiency and currency.

bullet

Identification of potential barriers and alternatives are communicated to the Candidate

bullet

A balance of product, process, knowledge and historical evidence is maintained

 RPL Process Overview                              

All RPL practices for certification purposes on MDT programmes will follow the broad, generic process of RPL as described in the SAQA Policy Document (Gazette 23186 – 4 March 2002):

 
Application
Screening
Assessment Plan
Preperation
Assessment
Judgment
Moderation
Feedback
Post Support

RPL Process & Procedure   

The following serves as a guideline, the process stages that are in the RPL process

No

Stage

Activity

Resources Required

1

Candidate Registration

1.        Candidate identifies competence areas for RPL purposes

MDT Registration Form

Service provider

2

Pre-assessment Screening

2.        Service Provider discusses process with Candidate to establish scope, purpose and viability of assessment

3.        Candidate identifies Scheme for assessment

4.        Candidate performs self assessment against Syllabi

Pre-assessment discussion

Syllabi

 

3

Assessment Plan

5.        Establish evidence requirements

6.        Establish assessment approach, tools & mechanisms

7.        Set dates & times of assessment

Assessor Guides

Assessment Plan

4

Candidate Preparation

8.        Provide guidance to Candidate in assessment & evidence principles

 

5

Assessment

9.        Candidate undergoes practical & theoretical assessment activities

Assessment Instruments

6

Judgment

10.     Assessor makes judgment on evidence, and / or

11.     Calls for additional evidence, and

12.     Makes a competence & developmental needs judgment

13.     Initial feedback given to Candidate

Assessment Instruments

7

Moderation

14.     Moderator moderates assessment

15.     Provide feedback to assessor

Moderation Documents

8

Feedback

16.     Provide feedback to Candidate

17.     Issue of certification

 

9

Post Assessment Support

18.     Identify and channel Candidate into development / training path if needed

Declaration of Competence

 Recognition of Qualifications: (Mutual recognition policy)

The MDT and its Service Providers are obligated to recognise qualifications and statements of attainment where another similar organisation has validly issued them. However:

It is recognised that due to the wide variance in the context and environment in which an individuals training and assessment took place, a particular qualification may not automatically grant equivalent rights or other guarantees of capability to perform certain skills.

The MDT has the right to consider such issues as currency and context to perform under specific conditions. Although a qualification that was issued by another organisation is valid, the person whom the qualification was issued to will not necessarily be still proficient five years later or in another context. This is exacerbated when the person has not maintained their skill through regular practice or refresher training.

When working or performing skills, a single error could have catastrophic results.

The MDT and its Service Providers therefore assert their right to assess an individual’s currency regardless of what qualifications are held before assigning an MDT certification.

Candidate Handbook Assessment Policy Moderation Policy Appeals Policy Disciplinary Policy Service Provision

 

The MDT Quality Management System has been established and is maintained by the Adventure Qualifications Network cc (AQN). If you would like further information about their services to the Adventure Industry, please feel free to contact them at: P.O.Box 2510, Hillcrest, 3650  Tel: 031 767 2160 or by Email   www.aqn.za.org

 


Copyright © South African Mountaineering Development & Training Trust
Last modified: 18 March 2010